ISSUE 4
Part II
27 May to 2 June
2002
Compiled by
Richard Sherman
Edited by
Kimo Goree
Published by the
International Institute for
Sustainable Development (IISD)
Distributed
exclusively to the
2002SUMMIT-L
list by
IISD Reporting Services
For more
information on the WSSD, visit IISD's Linkages Portal at
http://wssd.info
Editor's note:
Welcome to the fourth issue of
WSSD.Info
News, compiled by
Richard Sherman.
We hope to provide this service on at least a fortnightly basis from now
through the Summit. If you should come across a news article or have a
submission for the next issue, please send it directly to
Richard.
WSSD.Info
News is an exclusive publication of IISD for the
2002SUMMIT-L list
and should not be reposted or republished to other lists/websites without
the permission of IISD (you can write
Kimo for
permission.) If you have been forwarded this issue and would like to
subscribe to
2002SUMMIT-L,
please visit
http://iisd.ca/scripts/lyris.pl?join=2002summit-l.
Funding for the
production of WSSD.Info News (part of the IISD Reporting Services annual
program) has been provided by The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
the Government of Canada (through CIDA), the United States (through USAID),
the Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), the United
Kingdom (through the Department for International Development - DFID), the
European Commission (DG-ENV), the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and
the Government of Germany (through German Federal Ministry of Environment -
BMU, and the German Federal Ministry of Development Cooperation - BMZ).
General Support for the Bulletin
during 2002 is provided by the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Environment
of Finland, the Government of Australia, the Ministry of Environment and the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and
Trade of New Zealand, the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Environment of
Norway, Swan International, and the Japanese Ministry of Environment
(through the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies – IGES). If you
like WSSD.Info News, please thank them for their support.
Contents
Independent
2 June 2002
Internet:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/environment/story.jsp?story=301420
European governments have long suspected it. Environmentalists have long
proclaimed it. But now there is clear evidence that President George Bush's
environmental policy is indeed a load of crap. For the United States is
blocking an international plan to halve the number of people, two-fifths of
the population of the planet, who have no sanitation. Some 2.4 billion
people lack even a bucket for their wastes, and this is one of the main
causes of world disease. European and developing nations, meeting in Bali,
Indonesia, want the world's leaders to agree to meet this target by 2015.
They are proposing that the plan be put in front of the leaders when they
meet for a new "Earth Summit" in Johannesburg in August. The summit -
officially called the World Summit for Sustainable Development - is to
concentrate on the environmental problems faced by the world's poorest
people. The Bali meeting, which is the final preparatory conference for the
summit, is running into trouble, with the Bush administration, in the words
of one top Whitehall source, being "very, very negative". More than 2.2
million people - mainly children - die in the Third World every year from
diseases caused by lack of sanitation and by dirty drinking water. The
United Nations says that "the incidence of some illnesses and death could
drop by as much as 75 per cent" if adequate clean water and sanitation were
provided. Margaret Beckett, the Secretary of State for the Environment, who
is leading Britain's delegation to Bali, describes dealing with this issue
as "absolutely key to any prospect of tackling poverty". The US position is
baffling the other countries at the conference because the Bush
administration has already agreed a target of halving the number of people
without clean drinking water by the same date - and this is seen as
inseparable from solving the problem of sanitation. The British officials
held a special meeting with the American delegation on Thursday, but did not
receive any clear reason for their objection to the plan. The clash over
sanitation is only one of a range of issues holding up an agreement on a
plan of action to present to the summit. Opec countries are opposing a plan
- originating from an initiative by Tony Blair - to halve the number of
people, currently two billion, without any modern sources of energy, mainly
by tapping into renewable sources. And the US, Canada, Japan and Australia
are objecting to European proposals to make energy consumption in developed
countries more environmentally friendly. Senior British ministers fear that
if the Bali conference fails to reach agreement it will be hard for the
Johannesburg summit to succeed - and the best chance of tackling world
poverty in two decades will be lost for the indefinite future.
Associated Press
2 June 2002
Internet:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20020602/ap_wo_en_po/indonesia_development_conference_2
JAKARTA, Indonesia
- Delegates at a United Nations summit were close to completing an action
plan for an upcoming environmental conference, but were still stuck on
several issues, a U.N. official said Sunday. Thousands of delegates have
gathered at a fourth preparatory summit meeting in Bali and hoped to finish
negotiations on the action plan for the World Summit on Sustainable
Development by Sunday night. But talks broke off early Sunday morning,
leading U.N. officials to suggest the plan will not be completed until at
least Tuesday. "It's gone a little slower than what we expected," said
Lowell Flanders, a senior U.N. official tracking the negotiations. "But we
are getting there. We're not at loggerheads yet." Sticking points include
issues of good governance, transfer of technology and financial resources.
About 500 delegates have been meeting since Monday to hammer out a
nonbinding agreement and timetables that will be voted on at the conference
in Johannesburg in August by the heads of state. Delegates in Johannesburg
will also vote on a political declaration that will first be approved next
week in Bali. Some 50,000 delegates are expected for what is being dubbed
the "Earth Summit 2." The meeting is timed to fall on the 10-year
anniversary of the Rio De Janeiro Summit, where the first global agreements
on how to protect the environment were reached. Critics say many of the
goals governments promised in Rio have not been achieved. Three earlier
preparatory meetings for the summit prioritized five areas for negotiation:
water and sanitation, energy, health, agriculture and preserving natural
ecosystems. Delegates at the Bali meeting are expected to adopt targets
agreed at the U.N. Millennium Summit, such as halving by 2015 the number of
people who face poverty and hunger and the number who lack access to safe
drinking water and sanitation. The United Nations estimate 1.2 billion
people around the world live in poverty. At least 1.1 billion lack access to
safe drinking water. Environmentalists at the talks have accused wealthy
nations - led by Japan and the United States _of blocking proposals that
would tie governments to a timetable for implementing the action plan and
providing money for development programs to achieve its goals. Delegates
from rich nations have used the forum to urge poorer countries to address
corruption rampant in much of the developing world by enacting laws
promoting good governance and through stronger law enforcement. The Bali
talks opened on Monday and run for two weeks. Environmental and economic
ministers from dozens of countries are due to attend talks June 5-7.
Associated Press
2 June 2002
Internet:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20020602/ap_wo_en_po/britain_us_development_2
LONDON -
Environment Secretary Margaret Beckett on Sunday said U.S. decisions to
subsidize its farming industry and abstain from the Kyoto protocol on global
warming were simply short-term steps in the wrong direction. Speaking before
attending a meeting this week in Bali that is paving the way for the United
Nations eco-summit at Johannesburg in August, Beckett called on other
nations to keep pressure on the United States to fall into line with
international agreements on the environment.
"I do agree that
the recent American Farm Bill is certainly a step in the wrong direction,
but it is not what the administration wanted," Beckett told British
Broadcasting Corp. television. "We have seen a short-term step in the wrong
direction in America. What we have to do now is try to make sure that they
continue to pursue what they say are their long-term goals."
The farm bill,
signed by U.S. President George W. Bush last month, increases spending by
nearly 80 percent over the cost of existing programs and is estimated to
cost around dlrs 190 billion over the next 10 years. It raises subsidy rates
for grain and cotton growers and revives a target-price system abolished in
1996 to provide supplemental income. It also brings back subsidies for wool
and honey producers and provides new payments for milk, peanuts, lentils and
dry peas. Beckett said cuts to agricultural subsidies in the developed world
would be good both for Third World farmers, who would gain greater access to
lucrative European and American markets, and for First World consumers and
taxpayers. Beckett said Bush's refusal to endorse the Kyoto protocol did not
sound the death-knell for the agreement to tackle climate change. "Americans
are major polluters, but don't forget that this American government has said
that they accept that there is a climate change problem and accept that
action has to be taken to tackle it in America," she said. "I personally
believe that as we go on with the Kyoto protocol ... there is every
possibility that in the fullness of time the American business community and
interests in America that can see America losing out as a result of some of
these things will start to rethink and start to increase the pressure on
America itself." The Bali talks to agree on an action plan for the World
Summit on Sustainable Development in South Africa opened on Monday and run
for two weeks. Environmental and economic ministers from dozens of countries
are due to attend the gathering for three days from June 5. Some 50,000
delegates are expected in Johannesburg for what is being called the "Earth
Summit 2." The meeting is timed to fall on the 10-year anniversary of the
Rio De Janeiro Summit, where the first global agreements on how to protect
the environment were reached.
The Guardian
1 June 2002
Internet:
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/foreignaffairs/story/0,11538,725841,00.html
The European Union
and Japan ratified the Kyoto protocol yesterday, binding themselves to cut
greenhouse gas emissions despite America's refusal to have anything to do
with the treaty. The decision, announced on the first day of a meeting in
Bali to make final preparations for the Earth summit in Johannesburg in
August, is designed to give the talks much-needed impetus. John Prescott,
the deputy prime minister and one of the architects of the Kyoto deal in
1997, was delighted. The Japanese foreign minister, Yoriko Kawaguchi, rang
him yesterday to wish him a happy birthday and tell him of her government's
surprise decision to ratify. Mr Prescott said: "Mrs Kawaguchi rang me at
8.30am to say she had a birthday present for me. It was a nice way to start
the day. She knows how much importance I attach to this, having been so
closely involved for so long." It is exactly 10 years since the convention
on climate change was first negotiated at the inaugural Earth summit in Rio.
The first legally binding cuts were negotiated in 1997 in Kyoto, but
agreeing the details proved difficult and the United States, the world's
largest greenhouse gas emitter, pulled out when George Bush was elected.
The rest of the industrialised world decided to go ahead with the treaty in
Bonn last year and the EU promised to ratify it before the Johannesburg
summit. Some of America's allies, particularly Canada and Australia, have
been reluctant to proceed. Japan, however, is emotionally attached to the
treaty because it was negotiated in one of its cities, and had been keen to
push ahead as long as the US was on board. For the Kyoto protocol to enter
into force, 55 parties to the convention must ratify it, including
industrialised countries accounting for 55% of their total combined carbon
dioxide emissions in 1990. As of yesterday the first condition was met but
the second was proving more difficult because the US, which alone accounts
for 36.1% of the emissions, refuses to take part. Almost all other large
industrial countries, including Russia and the eastern European states, need
to join. The ratifications have given fresh impetus to the ratification
process, increasing the percentage of industrialised country emissions now
covered under the protocol from 2.7% to around 35.2%. Mr Prescott said
Russia, with 17.4%, had already begun the process, and President Vladimir
Putin had promised to complete. More signatories were still required to
reach 55%. In ratifying the Kyoto protocol, the EU legally commits itself to
reduce greenhouse gases by 8% from 1990 levels in the period 2008 to 2012,
and Japan by 6%. Some countries in the EU, such as Spain and Ireland, with
developing economies are allowed to increase emissions and others have
offered larger reductions. The UK's share is a 12.5% reduction, made easier
by the switch from coal to gas, which produces less carbon dioxide for the
same amount of heat. Eastern European countries such as the Czech Republic
and Romania, each with 1.2% of emissions, are likely to be keen to take part
in the Kyoto process. When international carbon trading starts they will
both have exceeded emission reduction targets and be able to sell surplus
carbon dioxide to countries that cannot reach their targets. Canada, with
3.3% of emissions, and Australia, with 2.1%, are likely to face increasing
diplomatic pressure to comply with the Bonn agreement, and to show that even
without the US the world is willing to tackle climate change
United Nations
Development Programme
31 May 2002
Internet:
http://allafrica.com/stories/200206010001.html
Delegates to the
upcoming World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in Johannesburg,
South Africa, will be able to consult a "consumption barometer" offering a
daily update on how much food, water, energy, paper and other resources they
use. Environmental audits carried out before, during and after the summit
will chart its impact -- and what it would have been without efforts to stay
"green." The Greening WSSD Initiative, launched by the Government of South
Africa, UNDP and the Global Environmental Facility (GEF), will showcase
environmental best practices to leave a useful legacy for the host country
and create greater awareness about environmental concerns championed at the
summit. More than 60,000 participants are expected to converge on
Johannesburg for the event from 26 August to 4 September. The Greening
Initiative is expected to influence how UN and other major gatherings are
organized in future. The Department of Agriculture, Conservation,
Environment and Land Affairs (DACEL) of Gauteng Province, UNDP and GEF are
providing more than US$4 million for the initiative. The South Africa
country office of the World Conservation Union is providing technical
assistance and managing the initiative. Mary Metcalfe, the provincial member
of the executive in charge of DACEL, said: "We must make sure that in our
efforts to demonstrate and document the effects of the summit we leave a
legacy of greater public awareness, which will positively influence how
people relate to the environment in the future." The initiative is a
"tangible way of showing that we can learn by putting into action the
message of the summit," said John Ohiorhenuan, UNDP Resident Representative
and UN Resident Coordinator. Mohamed T. El-Ashry, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of GEF, said that the project will also demonstrate to
participants the "choices that they can make during the WSSD and in their
daily lives to minimize the negative environmental impacts of their
activities." Over the next few months, extensive awareness campaigns through
the media, schools and other channels will educate South Africans about the
challenges and opportunities of promoting sound environmental practices and
sustainable development. Summit organizers will try to ensure that
procurement transactions take into consideration and reflect best
environmental practice. Service providers, such as those dealing with waste
management and transport, are expected to apply environmentally-friendly
standards in their services. Caterers are expected to source and use
reusable and recyclable materials as much as possible, and the five "R's" --
reduce, re-use, replace, recover and recycle - will be watchwords for the
summit. Specially designed tours will enable delegates to visit field
projects that demonstrate the challenges and opportunities associated with
sustainable development at the local level. Awards for the hospitality
industry will encourage environmentally sustainable operations. For further
information please contact Sharon Chetty, UNDP South Africa, or Cassandra
Waldon, UNDP Communications Office.
United Nations
Press Release
31 May 2002
Internet
http://www.johannesburgsummit.org/html/bali/pressreleases/envdevb10-e.htm
Tibetan Centre for
Human Rights and Democracy Denied Accreditation
The fourth and
final Preparatory Committee for the upcoming World Summit on Sustainable
Development was briefed this morning on the state of negotiations on the
Summit implementation plan, with speakers underlining the progress made in
the negotiations thus far and outlining the areas that required further
deliberation. In other business this morning, the Committee decided to
reject accreditation of a non-governmental organization (NGO), the Tibetan
Centre for Human Rights and Democracy, by a vote of 90 in favour of no
action to 37 against, with 10 abstentions. Representatives have formed two
working groups to advance their negotiations on the Chairman's paper, which
contains the text of the draft implementation programme (the latest version
of the text is contained in documents A/CONF.199/PC/WG.1/2 & WG.2/2), with a
third group deliberating on a Vice-Chairman's paper (see document
A/CONF.199/PC/L.3) entitled "Institutional Framework for Sustainable
Development".
STATUS OF
NEGOTIATIONS
KYOTAKA AKASAKA
(Japan) Co-Chair of Working Group I, which is assigned to deal with the
first half of the Chairman's paper, said the Group had worked very hard to
meet the Chairman's deadline of completion of work by this evening. About
80 per cent of the text was now agreed upon, within today's deadline. The
text of two "rather large" areas, energy and oceans, had been under
intensive consultation and were not included in the latest version of the
text. Even in those cases, good progress had been made, with many
differences having been bridged. More time was needed to complete
discussions on those items. Issues remaining in brackets included how to
deal with financial and technical issues. Some of the issues were linked to
those being discussed by the other Working Groups, which made it hard to
complete discussions without seeing the results of those Groups.
RICHARD BALLHORN
(Canada), Co-Chair of Working Group II, which is assigned to deal with the
second half of the Chairman's paper, said the latest text contained some
reproduction errors -- corrected copies were available at the back of the
room. The first chapter of the section, on sustainable development in a
globalizing world, had many bolded and bracketed texts. Trade and finance
issues would have to be dealt with in the relevant contact group. It was
not as unresolvable as it looked. He said chapter 6, on health and
sustainable development, was in reasonably good shape. Chapter 7, on Small
Island developing States, was also in reasonable shape. Discussions were
continuing, and there was a good chance that a number of the issues would be
resolved perhaps even by this afternoon. Chapter 8, on sustainable
development for Africa, had proceeded at a slightly different pace because
there had been less time at the last Preparatory Committee to deal with it.
Good progress had been made in a contact group on Africa yesterday, he
continued. It was quite a substantial text and in some cases delegations
were having to check with their authorities before they could decide. He
thought a substantial text could be achieved, but that some issues remained
to be resolved. He noted that there was now a chapter 8 bis -- proposals
for very concentrated regional initiatives to promote sustainable
development. In the final chapter, means of implementation, paragraphs 59 to
70 were the subject of a contact group and required significant further
group. He hoped experts in finance and trade -- where the biggest
challenges lay -- could sit down resolve those issues. Good progress had
been made on the remaining issues. IHAD GAMELELDIN (Egypt), Co-Chair of
Working Group II, said he was confident that the remaining issues could be
resolved. He noted good process had been made on such issues as
capacity-building and science and technology transfer. Discussions were
ongoing in the area of health. In a nutshell, progress was being made. EMIL
SALIM (Indonesia), Chairman of the Preparatory Committee, then urged
delegates to undertake a constructive approach to the remaining
negotiations. The time had come "to clean the text by focusing our
discussion on the brackets". The representative of Venezuela, for the "Group
of 77" developing countries and China, said any paragraph or section absent
from the two documents before the Committee didn't mean that they were
outside the document in real terms -- they were present in the text, even
though they didn't appear in it. The CHAIRMAN assured the Committee that
such passages would not be left out.
NON-GOVERNMENTAL
ORGANIZATION ACCREDITATION
When the Committee
took up accreditation of the Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy,
it had before it a letter from the Permanent Representative of China (see
document A/CONF.199/PC/19). The letter sets out China's firm objection to
accreditation of the NGO to the World Summit and its preparatory process,
because it was "a separatist organization that is same in nature as
'International Campaign for Tibet' and 'Tibet Justice Center' whose
applications for accreditation were resolutely rejected" by the Preparatory
Committee. At the outset of the Committee's consideration, the
representative of the United States said it was his position that legitimate
NGOs, such as the one in question, applying for accreditation could and
should be approved. All well-established and widely recognized NGOs could
make positive contributions to the Summit. The NGO in question was well
qualified to be accredited and to participate. He proposed that the plenary
grant the request for accreditation. The representative of Spain, for the
European Union and associated States, then said the Union welcomed the
participation of NGOs and other major groups at the Summit. They had an
important part to play in the discussions. A large number would be present
at Johannesburg representing a broad range of different views that would
help lead to a fruitful exchange of views. The Union believed that the NGO
in question should be able to participate in Johannesburg and he supported
its accreditation. This didn't mean it supported its views, however. The
Union supported the call for a vote just made by the United States
delegation. The representative of China next reaffirmed his delegation's
objection to the accreditation of the NGO in question. He moved to take "no
action" on the proposal of the United States and requested an immediate vote
by roll call. The Chinese government had consistently supported
participation in the Summit of NGOs operating in the spirit of the United
Nations Charter. The NGO in question was a political organization, which
had the aim of splitting China's territory. It had never carried out any
activities to help the socio-economic situation of Tibet, he noted. He
strongly appealed to vote yes to China's no action motion and reject the
NGO's application for accreditation. Following China's request, both
Pakistan and Cuba spoke in favour of the motion. The United States and
Spain, for the European Union, spoke against the motion. The motion was then
carried by a vote of 90 in favour to 37 against with 10 abstentions. Also
today, the Committee decided to accredit to the current meeting and the
World Summit two intergovernmental organizations, the Pacific Centre for
Environment and Sustainable Development and the Center for International
Forestry Research.
United Nations
31 May 2002
Internet:
http://www.johannesburgsummit.org/html/whats_new/otherstories_desertification.htm
31 May, BALI,
Indonesia- The dust blowing across China that assaulted Beijing this year
went on to reach Japan and Korea, but it did not stop there: it continued on
toward the west coast of North America, disrupting air travel and causing
health problems.
Dust storms are
increasing, according to Hama Arba Diallo, Executive Secretary of Convention
to Combat Desertification, and it is affecting areas that have never though
of it as a problem before. In fact, he said, sands blown away from Africa
recently landed in Switzerland. Land degradation has often been considered a
local issues, caused by poor land management, poor farming techniques, and
poor water distribution. But the problem, which affects an estimated 2.3
billion people in over 100 countries is now blowing across national
boundaries, and is having an international impact. The issue has emerged as
a major issue for the World Summit on Sustainable Development and United
Nations Secretary-General identified land degradation, which affects as much
as two thirds of the world's agricultural land, as one of the five main
areas where the Summit should concentrate efforts to achieve results. The
United Nations Environment Programme estimates that every year, 10 million
hectares of arable land are being lost to desertification, costing the world
close to $42 billion annually. Yet that the price-tag for action to avoid
further degradation would only be $2.4 million. "No one is listening, but
this is a good investment," Diallo said, but the treaty to halt land
degradation, with virtually universal membership, still has little funding.
There are proposals presently under consideration in the Bali PrepCom to
significantly increase funding to the Desertification Convention through the
Global Environment Facility, but there are some concerns that the GEF could
be stretched too thin unless donor countries agree to a significant
replenishment.
Mostafa Tolba, who
presided over the Earth Summit+5, and who is a member of a panel of eminent
personalities for the Convention, said it was essential to address the issue
of land degradation if the Johannesburg Summit is to succeed. "About 70 per
cent of the poverty in Asia and Africa is in rural areas. If you want to
address poverty, you have to go where the poverty is. Implementation of the
Convention would be a good way." According to Tolba, interest in the
desertification issue has flagged because it is not seen as affecting people
in developed countries, although dryland areas of Spain, Portugal and Greece
are experiencing degradation. Although people see a connection between
themselves and climate change and ozone depletion, he said that link is
often missing when it comes to desertification. The Desertification
Convention, an offspring of the 1992 Earth Summit, calls for a "bottom-up"
participatory approach where people in affected communities, including women
and youth, identify their problems and their solutions. The process
eventually percolates up to the national level where, countries adopt
national action plans. To date, 58 countries have adopted these plans, and
are now looking to donors for resources to implement them. But
desertification has not been a donor priority, Diallo says. Assistance to
hot spots, such as Afghanistan, East Timor and Kosovo, Diallo said, are
usually the explanation donors give why resources to fight desertification
are not forthcoming. Desertification, Diallo said, is not about build
barriers to prevent the spread of the desert, but rather, about taking steps
to transform fragile ecosystems back into land that can produce food.
According to Diallo, restoring degraded lands can also play an important
role in mitigating the effects of greenhouse gases by serving as a carbon
sink. "What we are saying," Diallo said, "is that dealing with land
degradation can lead to win-win scenarios." Partnerships will be important
he said, but since land degradation is typically a problem of the poorest of
the poor, most of the partnerships will necessarily require the public
sector. The development of voluntary partnership initiatives has emerged as
a third major outcome of the Johannesburg Summit. The partnerships, it is
hoped, will go beyond what governments can and must do to implement
sustainable development.
United Nations
31 May 2002
Internet:
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=3825&Cr=sustainable&Cr1=development
31 May -
Negotiators meeting in Bali, Indonesia, today reported progress in their
efforts to hammer out draft final documents for adoption by the World Summit
for Sustainable Development, which will convene this August in Johannesburg.
Reporting to a plenary session of the Summit's Preparatory Committee,
Kyotaka Akasaka of Japan, who chaired negotiations on parts of the text,
said agreement had been reached on 80 per cent of the language. Two "rather
large" sections, on energy and oceans, had been under intensive
consultation, he added, noting that despite some progress, more time would
be needed to complete discussions on those issues. Richard Ballhorn of
Canada, another chief negotiator, said agreement was still outstanding on
sections concerning globalization, trade and finance. Other areas were
largely agreed on, including those relating to health and sustainable
development. Negotiator Ihad Gameleldin of Egypt, who is also chairing
talks on portions of the document, voiced confidence that remaining issues
could be resolved, pointing out that good process had been achieved on
issues related to science and technology. Also today, the Preparatory
Committee considered applications from several intergovernmental and
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to participate in the Johannesburg
Summit. A motion by China for the Committee to take no action on the
application of the Tibet Centre for Human Rights and Democracy, an NGO, was
approved by a vote of 90 in favour, 37 against, and 10 abstentions,
effectively rejecting the bid for participation. The Pacific Centre for
Environment and Sustainable Development and the Center for International
Forestry Research were both accredited without a vote.
The Herald (Harare)
via All Africa
31 May 2002
Internet:
http://allafrica.com/stories/200205310413.html
AT 66 years old,
Ambuya Berita Chanakira from Epworth should be retired and enjoying a
pension at some old people's home. But that life is still a fairy tale and a
luxury least afforded by most of the people in the Third World where daily
chores include warding off the poverty scourge. To expect people who daily
endure the ravages of dire poverty, hunger, disease, war and natural
disasters such as droughts, floods and earthquakes for many decades to come
to understand the advantages of sustainable development in a globalising
environment is but a tall order. For Ambuya Chanakira, constant hard work in
her small vegetable garden since her husband's death in 1986 has helped her
escape the grinding penury that is the order of day for the majority of
people in Epworth, a run down settlement that rapidly sprouted after 1980
into a major urban residential area 10km outside Harare. "This is a very
poor community, but I have never expected someone to give me food," said
Ambuya Chanakira, taking a break from adding fertiliser to the soil in her
vegetable garden along a small stream running through the settlement. "I
have to struggle everyday to fend for myself." While Ambuya Chanakira's
efforts to feed herself have had little effect on the environment, the
struggle for survival for many Zimbabweans and others elsewhere on the
globe, where poverty reins supreme, has, however, resulted in environment
degradation to a point that economic and physical survival is being
seriously threatened. "Since the 1970s the environment and key natural
resources in most African countries have been increasingly threatened by
escalating and unsustainable pressures from fast growing populations and
cities as well as expanding agricultural and industrial activities," says
the Global Environment Outlook 2000, a report by the United Nations
Environment Agency, the United Nations Environment Programme. The UNEP
reports that Africa is the only continent where poverty is expected to rise
during the next 100 years. This prediction comes at a time when the
continent's 500 million hectares of land have been affected by soil
degradation; the number of undernourished people has doubled to over 200
million since the 1960s; 50 million hectares of tropical forest have
disappeared since 1980; and water scarcity has continued to increase over
the years. The UNEP further points out that Africa is also still suffering
from economic development policies and patterns, imported by colonial
authorities that "largely neglected the adverse impacts on the poor majority
of people and on the environment". Says the UNEP: "On achieving independence
during and after the 1960s, African governments inherited and maintained
centralised economic and sectoral institutions and narrowly-focused growth
policies, usually with the encouragement and support of international aid
agencies. "These national and international 'development' policies, in
combination with rapid population growth and increased poverty, had
progressively adverse impacts on the state of the environment and natural
resource base." Epworth, a former property of the United Methodist
Church-run Mission School but invaded by desperate home-seekers from Harare
when Zimbabwe became independent in 1980, is a perfect example of the real
dilemmas and obstacles many developing countries are facing to achieve
sustainable levels. Recognised as an urban settlement after a Local
Government Board was appointed to run the area in 1986, Epworth's population
has rapidly increased over the years to more than 45 000 today. Despite the
Government's pledge since the mid-1980s to develop the area by installing
proper sewerage and water systems, constructing roads and electrifying
houses, Epworth has remained an eyesore as more home-seekers continue to
invade the settlement consequently throwing planners off course. The
majority of people are unemployed, crime and environmental degradation are
rampant as people devise means of survival. Sand and wood poachers have
wrecked havoc in the surrounding farms, stealing sand to construct their
homes and wood for domestic fuel after the cost of paraffin rose to
unaffordable levels. The area is now so densely populated that attempts to
properly settle the people would actually involve removing everyone and
flattening much of the settlement since the present set up has no provision
for roads, sewers and electricity power lines. A severe drought that has
swept across most of Southern Africa has also exacerbated the plight of the
people in Epworth after their small crop fields wilted. By merely
multiplying the plight of the people in Epworth by Zimbabwe's 15 major urban
areas where similar problems occur the country's economic and environmental
problems become a complex jig-saw puzzle. While blaming corrupt governments
for the Third World's economic and environmental crises, the International
Monitory Fund and World Bank-initiated reforms have so far managed to bring
about little relief either. The solutions to the poverty trap, that have
ironically ignored the issue of debt relief, have completely failed to
reverse the environmental catastrophe facing poor nations. The United
Nations hopes that a World Summit on Sustainable Development, due to start
in Johannesburg, South Africa, on 26 August this year, will produce
"concrete results" on providing clean water and sanitation and energy to
developing countries, and health, agriculture and biodiversity issues. The
UN conference is a follow-up to the 1992 "Earth Summit" held in Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil, that put, for the first time, environmental issues on the
global political agenda. "The planet is at a crucial crossroads with the
choices made today critical for the forests, oceans, rivers, mountains,
wildlife and other life support systems upon which current and future
generations depend," the latest UNEP global report says. It is, therefore,
crucial that world leaders attending the Johannesburg meeting find the
political courage and the innovative financing needed to implement the
hundreds of declarations, agreements, guidelines and legally-binding
treaties made so far, says the UNEP Executive Director Klaus Toepfer. A
World Bank official responsible for environmental issues, Mr Ian Johnson,
says: "I think one of the themes that will emerge at a political level in
Johannesburg is how to make globalisation work for poor countries. "There's
quite a lot of evidence to suggest that public opinion is concerned about
many of the issues that will be raised at the Johannesburg summit and
politicians have yet to grasp how important it is to many people." Balancing
these issues and setting priorities right at the global level to achieve
sustainable development in a world where the number of poor people continues
to rise is definitely going to be a difficult task for the world leaders for
some time to come. For a better future to be realised in Africa, the UNEP
has, for instance, concluded that: "The key challenge is to reduce poverty.
"New approaches that put the poor at the top of the environment and
development agenda could tap and release the latent energy and talents of
Africans to bring about development that is economically, socially,
environmentally and politically sustainable."
United Nations
30 May 2002
Internet:
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=3811&Cr=sustainable&Cr1=development
30 May -
Negotiators are finalizing documents that are expected to be endorsed by the
upcoming World Summit on Sustainable Development, according to a UN official
attending the preparatory session in Bali, Indonesia. "Overall, we are
progressing quite well," Lowell Flanders, a senior official with the Summit
Secretariat, told reporters. He predicted that working groups assigned to
negotiate the text would complete the bulk of their talks by Friday evening.
The Summit itself will convene in Johannesburg, South Africa, this August.
Critical issues still requiring further deliberation include trade and
finance, natural disasters, oceans, water, sanitation, and the establishment
of a world solidarity fund for poverty eradication, according to Mr.
Flanders. The section of the document related to Africa was also being
further negotiated, as was the issue of how best to deal with the issue of
climate change. Some of the text currently in brackets, indicating that it
is still in dispute, might "go through to Johannesburg" for final
consideration, he said. In another development, the UN today released the
unabridged version of an article by Kofi Annan on sustainable development
which was published yesterday in The Financial Times. Mr. Annan argues that
ecological and economic considerations must be integrated in order to
achieve sustainable development. He recommends that the Johannesburg Summit
pay priority attention to issues linked to water, energy, health,
agriculture and biodiversity. Acknowledging that tackling all of those areas
may sound either too ambitious or too limited, Mr. Annan says this agenda
represents "the essential, achievable start that we must make, if we are to
preserve the hope of a decent life for our children and grandchildren."
Associated Press
Writer
30 May 2002
Internet:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20020530/ap_wo_en_po/indonesia_development_conference_1
JAKARTA, Indonesia
- Illegal logging will continue in poor countries unless demand from rich
nations drops and law enforcement is stepped up, activists at a U.N.
development conference in Bali said on Thursday. Forestry is one of dozens
of development and environmental issues being debated by around 6,000
international delegates at the 12-day meeting. Delegates from rich and poor
nations are debating a political declaration and action plan to be taken to
the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg in August. That
meeting will mark the 10-year anniversary of the Rio de Janeiro Earth
Summit, which was the first international attempt to tackle environmental
issues. Environmentalists, also represented at the talks, have already
criticized the Bali convention, and accused wealthy nations of trying to
wreck it. "We want the political declaration to say governments have to play
a bigger role in helping reduce consumption and create good law
enforcement," said Farah Sofa from Walhi, Indonesia's leading green
organization. Speaking by phone from Bali, Sofa said delegates from wealthy
countries were insisting that log-tracking technology and labeling systems
under which timber is identified as coming from legitimate sources were the
best ways to wipe out illegal logging. Corruption in many poor countries
where exporters can easily buy fake documents meant that this approach was
ineffective, she said. "If the demand from rich countries is there, illegal
logging will continue," Sofa said.
Massive expansion
in the plywood, pulp and paper industries over the last 20 years has led to
much of the world's forests being wiped out, environmentalists say. Critics
say graft within the security forces, and forestry and port officials allows
for huge amounts of illegal timber to be sold and shipped throughout Asia.
Leading global pulp and paper industries admit as much as 60 percent of the
timber they use has been illegally felled, according to a recent study by
World Resource Institute. In Indonesia, the World Bank estimate that all of
Sumatra's forests will be destroyed by logging in five years. Those in
Kalimantan will be wiped out in 10 years.
The Bali meeting,
which started on Monday, will peak between June 5-7 when ministerial-level
negotiations from U.N-member states are due to be held.
United Nations
Press Release
30 May 2002
Internet:
http://www.johannesburgsummit.org/html/bali/pressreleases/envdevb9-e.htm
As the final
Preparatory Committee for the upcoming World Summit on Sustainable
Development continued its session today, government representatives focused
their attention on the draft implementation programme to be adopted by the
Summit this September in Johannesburg, South Africa. Speaking at the daily
briefing held by the Department of Public Information, Lowell Flanders, a
senior official with the Summit Secretariat, said "Overall, we are
progressing quite well", and it looked increasingly likely that the working
groups assigned to negotiate the text would complete the bulk of their work
by tomorrow evening. He informed correspondents that the critical issues
still requiring further deliberation included trade and finance, natural
disasters, oceans, water, sanitation and the establishment of a world
solidarity fund for poverty eradication. The section of the document
related to Africa was also being further negotiated, as was the issue of how
best to reflect climate change in the text. If agreement wasn't reached on
those issues by the close of this evening, it was possible that Preparatory
Committee Chairman Emil Salim (Indonesia) would convene a "committee of the
whole" tomorrow morning to try to reach agreement. He added that it was
possible that a few phrases or bracketed text might "go through to
Johannesburg" for final consideration. Representatives have formed two
working groups to advance their negotiations on the Chairman's paper, which
contains the draft (see document A/CONF.199/PC/L.1/Rev.1), with a third
group deliberating on a Vice-Chairman's paper (see document
A/CONF.199/PC/L.3) entitled "Institutional Framework for Sustainable
Development", covering among other things, the question of governance.
Working group I is
dealing with the introduction and chapters on poverty eradication; changing
unsustainable patterns of consumption and production; and protecting and
managing the natural resource base of economic and social development.
Working group II is
covering the chapters on sustainable development in a globalizing world;
health and sustainable development; sustainable development of small island
developing States; sustainable development initiatives for Africa and means
of implementation. Also today, side events sponsored by civil society
representatives were held on such topics as: mining and sustainable
development; new strategies for sustainable energy, healthy forests, better
land and water management and food security; and habitat and sustainable
development. So far, over 3,365 people from 153 countries are participating
in the preparatory meeting, including 1,342 government delegates, 931
representatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and 144
journalists.
The Jakarta Post
30 May 2002
Internet:
http://www.thejakartapost.com/detailheadlines.asp?fileid=20020530.@04&irec=3
Debt payments
amounting to 40 percent of the state budget and a chronic budget deficit has
driven Indonesia to seek more financial aid and new debt payment options
from developed countries at the United Nations meeting in Bali on
sustainable development. A member of the Indonesian delegation, Djumala
Darmansjah, said developing countries were seeking to include loan and debt
payment proposals into the action plan, which delegates were negotiating
on. He said one suggestion was to include some US$30 billion in funds
developed countries had promised during a meeting on poverty in Monterey,
Mexico, into the action plan. "Indonesia is actively pursuing its interests
during the talks. It was, after all, our proposal to get the Monterey fund
into the negotiations," Djumala said on Wednesday. The country has much to
gain from the talks. Debts totaling $130 billion have undermined efforts to
create employment, cut poverty or, for that matter, promote sustainable
development. Domestic debt payments outweigh spending on development, of
which only a portion is allocated for social welfare programs. While
spending has been kept to a minimum, the state budget remains in a deficit,
forcing the government to rely on foreign aid to cover the shortfall.
The U.S. and the
European Union agreed at a meeting on poverty in Monterey early this year to
set aside $30 billion in aid to help reduce poverty worldwide. Djumala said
the means to channel the funds had not been drawn up yet, allowing it to be
integrated into the Chairman's Text now under negotiation. Delegates from
around the world have gathered in Bali for the fourth preparatory committee
meeting that leads up to the World Summit on Sustainable Development in
Johannesburg, South Africa in August and September. The summit is aiming to
hammer out a more concrete action plan after the first one agreed at the
1992 summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, failed to produce the desired
results. Delegates in Bali expect to finalize negotiations of the
Chairman's Text, which is the action plan for world leaders to sign in
Johannesburg, South Africa. Chapter IX of the Chairman's Text will draw the
most heated debates, as it outlines the means and implementation of the
action plan. Falling under chapter IX are the issues of loans to finance
sustainable development programs, and Djumala said it was obvious that
developed countries were defensive on this issue. "It's their money and
they just don't accept other countries telling them how to spend it," he
said. But he added that developed countries could back down on their stance
later on during the committee of the whole meeting, where different working
groups get together to iron out the final issues. He said Indonesia along
with other developing countries also proposed to utilize the International
Monetary Fund's (IMF) loans to finance sustainable development programs.
Also called the Special Drawing Rights, the IMF loans cover only a country's
balance of payment in cases of a liquidity crisis. Indonesia has been under
the IMF's auspices since the country was hit by the 1997 economic crisis.
Other suggestions under negotiation in the Chairman's Text are to loosen
financial aid to the least developed countries and promote the use of aid to
boost development. One suggestion accepted by all is the call for action to
meet developed countries' targets of allocating 0.7 percent of their gross
domestic product (GDP) to overseas development assistance. Indonesian
Delegation head Makarim Wibisono said implementation of the Monterey pledge
would bring overseas development assistance closer to its target. At
present, he said, the average overseas development assistance stands at 0.39
percent of GDP. To help cut the debt burden carried by developing
countries, they proposed several debt solutions, Djumala said. These
include debt-swapping payments with sustainable development programs or a
debt-to-nature swap that would, for instance, protect forest areas from
timber companies. Preliminary talks of a debt-to-nature swap are under way
on a bilateral basis, such as with Germany. However, the amount has been
relatively small. So far the only debt relief has come from the
rescheduling of Indonesia's foreign debts under the Paris Club group of
creditors. Some NGOs have called for more drastic measures, such as
demanding debt reduction. The government, however, is unlikely to entertain
such demands, reasoning that the mere mention of a default would condemn
Indonesia to isolation from the international finance community.
The Jakarta Post
30 May 2002
Internet:
http://www.thejakartapost.com/detailfeatures.asp?fileid=20020530.M07&irec=6
Developed countries
have given the cold shoulder to their commitment to help developing
countries achieve sustainable development, even at the last leg of meetings
before the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg later in
August and September. Kenneth G. Ruffing, acting director and chief
economist at the environment directorate of the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD), acknowledged on Wednesday that developed
countries continued to show reluctance in spending money to support less
fortunate countries, despite their rhetorical commitments on sustainable
development. "We would like to see them be more ambitious in targeting
goals and promises that they have made. We would like to see a higher level
of ambition to protect the earth by promoting sustainable development,"
Ruffing said on the sidelines of the preparatory committee meeting for the
World Summit. OECD, established in 1960, comprises 30 developed countries,
and aims to contribute to the development of the world economy. However,
according to OECD data, in the past 10 years after the Earth Summit in Rio
de Janeiro, developed countries have failed to fulfill their own commitments
to provide the equivalent of 0.7 percent of their gross domestic product to
help developing countries. The only country that managed to fulfill that
commitment was Denmark, while the others spent about 0.2 percent of their
GDP. "They always come up with reasons for their lack of ability to fulfill
the commitments. Of course, there is no sanctions mechanism in the
organization," Ruffing remarked. One of the main reasons cited by developed
countries to avoid commitments is the lack of good governance on the part of
developing countries and ineffective use of aid. He added that it was
unhelpful if developed countries made generalizations, as each developing
country faced different problems. Considering the specific situation in
each country, Ruffing said that the OECD had adopted a new paradigm to deal
with the problem differently in each developing country. He cited that it
would be unfair to ask developing countries to look for alternative energy
sources if they could not afford to do so. In many cases, it would take a
while before developed countries brought down the cost of producing
alternative energy so that developing countries could change their
consumption patterns without paying higher prices, he remarked. To deal
with the problem, OECD is trying to take the lead in initiatives aimed at
nature conservation
The Jakarta Post
30 May 2002
Internet:
http://www.thejakartapost.com/detailfeatures.asp?fileid=20020530.M05&irec=4
The People's
Republic of China (PRC) has again expressed its strong objection that the
Tibetan Center for Human Rights and Democracy (TCHRD) be allowed to attend
the upcoming World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South
Africa. The decision of whether the TCHRD will be allowed to attend the
meeting will be decided on Friday during the United Nations (UN)'s plenary
meeting here, confirmed Pragati J. Pascale, a senior media officer at the
UN. Norzin Dolma, one of TCHRD's activists, said on Wednesday that the
Chinese Permanent Representative to the UN had requested the world
organization exclude his group from participating at the World Summit slated
to be held from August to September this year. The organization has already
registered with the UN on its participation at the upcoming summit. In a
letter sent to the UN Headquarters two weeks ago, the Chinese representative
accused members of the TCHRD group of being separatists who support the
independence of Tibet, said Dolma. The PRC representative has also said
that the presence of the group was not relevant to the issue of sustainable
development, and they merely wanted to slander the PRC government at the
event. It was the third attempt by the Chinese government, after two
previous successful moves to kick out two other pro-Tibet organizations, the
International Campaign for Tibet (ICT) and the Tibet Justice Center (TJC),
from participating in the next World Summit. In the UN's General Assembly
meeting last April, the majority of UN member countries, including
Indonesia, rejected the presence of the two pro-Tibetan organizations in the
World Summit. "Their allegations that we would raise political issues is
groundless. We are committed to focusing on various environmental problems
in Tibet," explained Norzin at the sidelines of the PrepCom meeting
South African Press
Association via All Africa
30 May2002
Internet:
http://allafrica.com/stories/200206010061.html
Discussions on
Africa at the United Nations' final preparatory meeting for the World Summit
on Sustainable Development (WSSD), being held on the Indonesian island of
Bali, appear to be heading for a "very positive outcome", says a senior
South African official.